Judaism, Islam and Christianity are three religions that also known as the Abrahamic religions. While Judaism and Islam maintain the belief of strict monotheism (that God is one), Christianity on the other hand has the unique monotheism. The type of theism the Christian believe in is Trinitarian Monotheism (it is Tri but at same time it is Mono) which in simple means 'one God in three persons' [1]. Throughout the history of Christianity, there were numerous numbers of council and creed. I personally like to read about the history of Christianity. One of the creeds in Christianity is called the Athanasian Creed. The main content of the creed is about the concept and the persons of Trinity. The doctrine of Trinity is one of the interesting subjects to be studied. These are several lines from the Athanasian Creed [2]:
“That we worship one God in Trinity and Trinity in Unity”.
“The Father uncreate, the Son uncreate, and the Holy Ghost uncreate”.
“The Father eternal, the Son eternal, and the Holy Ghost eternal. And yet they are not three eternals, but one eternal”.
“So likewise the Father is Almighty, the Son Almighty, and the Holy Ghost Almighty. And yet they are not three Almighties, but one Almighty”.
“So the Father is God, the Son is God, and the Holy Ghost is God. And yet they are not three Gods, but one God”.
“The Father is made of none, neither created, nor begotten. The Son is of the Father alone, not made, nor created, but begotten. The Holy Ghost is of the Father (and of the Son), neither made, nor created, nor begotten, but proceeding”. [3]
Above are several lines from the creed. Let us be honest in this discussion. One is not same with three in one. When you say ‘one God’ it means one God. But the belief of Christianity about God is, the Father (without the Son and Holy Ghost) alone is God. The Son (without the Father and Holy Ghost) alone is God. The Holy Ghost (without the Father and Son) alone is God. Yet, the Christians still believe that there is only one God. When the Christians say that the Son is co-eternal, co-exist with the Father, then how come the Son becomes a Son if he is co-eternal and co-exist with the Father? It is like saying, I have a father and I am his son, but my father and I existed in this earth at the same time.
If Jesus was co-eternal in time with God, then that negates Jesus being a ‘begotten son of God’. The creed also mentioned that, the son is of the Father alone, not made, nor created, but begotten. What do you mean by ‘begotten but not made/created’? Let us be honest once again, the concept of Trinity cannot be explained. There are many Christian sects who deny the concept of Trinity (where often they are categorized as cult) such as the Arianism (4th century) some radical reformers (16 century), such as Michael Servetus, Jehovah’s Witnesses [4] and Unitarianism. The reasons given for rejecting the doctrine of Trinity [5]:
1) It is not mentioned in the Bible.
2) It does not make philosophical sense.
3) It is not compatible with monotheism.
4) It is not necessary in order to explain the “specialness” of Jesus.
It is indeed that Trinity cannot be explained. Even the Christian scholars usually will use the word ‘mystery’ when they try to explain the concept of Trinity. In the Catechism of the Catholic Church, the Trinity is explained in such way:
“The mystery of the Most Holy Trinity is the central mystery of the Christian faith and of Christian life”. [6]
The definition of the word ‘mystery’ is ‘anything that is kept secret or remains unexplained or unknown’ [7]. Yet, there are many Christians in this world today say that they understand Trinity or trying to explain Trinity. If it is a mystery, than do not explain it because it cannot be explained. If it cannot be explained, then how do you understand the concept? The Christians will say that God have made them understand the Trinity. Yet (once again), when we ask you what is Trinity? You (the person who already understand what is Trinity) still cannot explain it to us.
This strange concept of Trinity is so difficult to understand, where Augustine himself did not even understand it. Augustine said, “If we be asked to define the Trinity, we can only say, it is not this or that” [8]. St. Athanasius one of the great propagators of the concept of Trinity has candidly confessed that whenever he force his understanding to meditate upon the divinity of the Logos, his toilsome and unavailing efforts recoiled on themselves; that the more he thought, the less he comprehended; and the more he wrote, the less capable was he of expressing his thoughts” [9]. Maybe the Christians still trying to believe this concept because of this saying:
“Try to explain it, and you’ll lose your mind; But try to deny it, and you’ll lose your soul”.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
[1] More information about the concept of Trinity is here.
[2] The whole creed can be read here.
[3] More information about the Holy Spirit and where did it come from can be found here.
[4]An explanation by Watchtower Society on the topic of ‘Should You Believe In Trinity?’ Click here.
[5] The reasons of rejecting and the reasons for believing here.
[6] Catechism of the Catholic Church – Part 1 Section 2 Chapter 1 Article 1 Paragraph 2 here.
[7] Dictionary.com – Mystery
[8] Philip Schaff, History of the Christian Church, Volume 3, Section 130, page 672
[9] Gibbon, The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, chapter 5, paragraph 1, quoted in Alonzo T. Jones' The Two Republics, page 334
“That we worship one God in Trinity and Trinity in Unity”.
“The Father uncreate, the Son uncreate, and the Holy Ghost uncreate”.
“The Father eternal, the Son eternal, and the Holy Ghost eternal. And yet they are not three eternals, but one eternal”.
“So likewise the Father is Almighty, the Son Almighty, and the Holy Ghost Almighty. And yet they are not three Almighties, but one Almighty”.
“So the Father is God, the Son is God, and the Holy Ghost is God. And yet they are not three Gods, but one God”.
“The Father is made of none, neither created, nor begotten. The Son is of the Father alone, not made, nor created, but begotten. The Holy Ghost is of the Father (and of the Son), neither made, nor created, nor begotten, but proceeding”. [3]
Above are several lines from the creed. Let us be honest in this discussion. One is not same with three in one. When you say ‘one God’ it means one God. But the belief of Christianity about God is, the Father (without the Son and Holy Ghost) alone is God. The Son (without the Father and Holy Ghost) alone is God. The Holy Ghost (without the Father and Son) alone is God. Yet, the Christians still believe that there is only one God. When the Christians say that the Son is co-eternal, co-exist with the Father, then how come the Son becomes a Son if he is co-eternal and co-exist with the Father? It is like saying, I have a father and I am his son, but my father and I existed in this earth at the same time.
If Jesus was co-eternal in time with God, then that negates Jesus being a ‘begotten son of God’. The creed also mentioned that, the son is of the Father alone, not made, nor created, but begotten. What do you mean by ‘begotten but not made/created’? Let us be honest once again, the concept of Trinity cannot be explained. There are many Christian sects who deny the concept of Trinity (where often they are categorized as cult) such as the Arianism (4th century) some radical reformers (16 century), such as Michael Servetus, Jehovah’s Witnesses [4] and Unitarianism. The reasons given for rejecting the doctrine of Trinity [5]:
1) It is not mentioned in the Bible.
2) It does not make philosophical sense.
3) It is not compatible with monotheism.
4) It is not necessary in order to explain the “specialness” of Jesus.
It is indeed that Trinity cannot be explained. Even the Christian scholars usually will use the word ‘mystery’ when they try to explain the concept of Trinity. In the Catechism of the Catholic Church, the Trinity is explained in such way:
“The mystery of the Most Holy Trinity is the central mystery of the Christian faith and of Christian life”. [6]
The definition of the word ‘mystery’ is ‘anything that is kept secret or remains unexplained or unknown’ [7]. Yet, there are many Christians in this world today say that they understand Trinity or trying to explain Trinity. If it is a mystery, than do not explain it because it cannot be explained. If it cannot be explained, then how do you understand the concept? The Christians will say that God have made them understand the Trinity. Yet (once again), when we ask you what is Trinity? You (the person who already understand what is Trinity) still cannot explain it to us.
This strange concept of Trinity is so difficult to understand, where Augustine himself did not even understand it. Augustine said, “If we be asked to define the Trinity, we can only say, it is not this or that” [8]. St. Athanasius one of the great propagators of the concept of Trinity has candidly confessed that whenever he force his understanding to meditate upon the divinity of the Logos, his toilsome and unavailing efforts recoiled on themselves; that the more he thought, the less he comprehended; and the more he wrote, the less capable was he of expressing his thoughts” [9]. Maybe the Christians still trying to believe this concept because of this saying:
“Try to explain it, and you’ll lose your mind; But try to deny it, and you’ll lose your soul”.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
[1] More information about the concept of Trinity is here.
[2] The whole creed can be read here.
[3] More information about the Holy Spirit and where did it come from can be found here.
[4]An explanation by Watchtower Society on the topic of ‘Should You Believe In Trinity?’ Click here.
[5] The reasons of rejecting and the reasons for believing here.
[6] Catechism of the Catholic Church – Part 1 Section 2 Chapter 1 Article 1 Paragraph 2 here.
[7] Dictionary.com – Mystery
[8] Philip Schaff, History of the Christian Church, Volume 3, Section 130, page 672
[9] Gibbon, The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, chapter 5, paragraph 1, quoted in Alonzo T. Jones' The Two Republics, page 334